LANGUAGE ORCHESTRATION IN THE COURT ARENA: AN EXPLORATION OF FERDY SAMBO'S SPEECH IN A MURDER CASE TRIAL

Berliana Anugrah Suci, Asri Wahyuni, Afrini Rahmi

Abstract


This study delves into the captivating world of courtroom rhetoric of Ferdy Sambo's speech acts. The research employs a descriptive qualitative approach to uncover the nuances and dynamics of speech acts exhibited by Ferdy Sambo during trial dialogues. The data, consisting of excerpts from his court speeches, is sourced from audio-visual recordings available on Kompas TV's YouTube channel. Employing techniques like free engagement, note-taking, and speaking analysis, the study engages with both assertive and directive speech acts, dissecting their forms and functions. The analysis method involves meticulous matching and categorization, leading to intriguing findings. The assertive speech acts reveal 46 instances of declarations, while suggestions manifest in a single instance. Expressing opinions emerge twice, with reporting being present once. On the other hand, directive speech acts come in the form of orders and inquiries, with 12 instances and 2 instances respectively. This analysis is enriched by delving into the referential meaning within the data, offering a comprehensive understanding of Ferdy Sambo's courtroom communication.


Full Text:

PDF

References


Aminuddin. (2008). SEMANTIC (Introduction to the Study of Meaning). inBandung ; Algensindo New Light.

Aminuddin. (2015).Semantics: Introduction to the Study of Meaning. Bandung: Algesindo's New Light.

Chaer, A. (2010).Early Introductory Sociolinguistics. Jakarta: PT Rineka Cipta.

Chaer, A. (2012).General linguistics. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.

Urged Paramita Brata, Ni Putu Rai Yuliartini, & Dewa Gede Sudika Mangku. (2020). Juridical Review The Principle of Open Public Hearings in Broadcasting of Criminal Trial Processes.The Yustisia Community, Ganesha University of Education, Legal Science Study Program, 3(1), 79–89.

Djamali, A. (2012).Introduction to Indonesian Law. Jakarta: Rajawali Press.

Manaf, N. (2010).Indonesian semantics (1st ed.). UNP Press.

Moleong. (2016). Moleong.Phenomenon Research, Chapter iii(April 2021), 1–9.

Moleong, L. J. (2016).Qualitative Research Methodology. Bandung: PT. Rosdakarya youth.

Nadar, F. (2009).Pragmatics & Pragmatic Research. Yogyakarta: Science Graha.

Nuramila. (2020). Speech Acts in Social Media: A Pragmatic Study.Educational And Social Foundation, 53(9), 1–20. https://eprints.uny.ac.id/8371/3/BAB 2-05210144025.pdf/online/131020

Pakaya, U. (2017).Legal Language in Criminal Case Decisions. 151–175.

Purnanto, D. (2010). Structure, Function, and Interpretation of the Meaning of Language Use in the Criminal Trial Process: A Case Study in the District Court of Surakarta Region. S3 Program in Descriptive Linguistics.Surakarta: UNS Postgraduate Program.

R, S. (2008). Politeness Pragmatics. Padang Press State University.

Rahardi, K. (2005).Indonesian Imperative Politeness Pragmatics. Erlangga.

Siahaan, T. S. (2019). Book 3: Handling of Civil Cases at the First Level.Secretariat General of the Ministry of Finance of the Republic of Indonesia, 1–62.

Suciati, E. (2018).Defense Speech Actions in Wayan Mirna Shalihin's Coffee Cyanide Case Trial.

Sudaryanto. (2015). Methods and Various Techniques of Language Analysis. inyogyakarta: Duta Wacana University Press, To install Yogyakarta.

Sugiyono. (2014).Quantitative Qualitative Research Methods R&D. Bandung: ALPHABETA, CV.

Sugiyono. (2020).Qualitative Research Methods (for Explorative, Enterpretive, Interactive and Constructive Research). London: ALPHABETA.

Suryanti. (2020). Pragmatics. inSemarang. It ended.

Tarigan, H. G. (2009).Pragmatic Teaching. Bandung: Space.

Wijana, I. D. P. (2016).Pragmatic Basics. Yogyakarta: Andi Offset.

Yule, G. (2006).pragmatic. Yogyakarta: Student Libraries.

Yule, G. (2006).Pragmatic. Yogyakarta: Student Libraries.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Flag Counter