Compliance and Implementation: Assessing the Readiness of European Universities to Meet AI Literacy Obligations under the AI Act (2025)

Marit Van Dijk

Abstract


This study assesses the readiness of higher education institutions across the European Union to fulfil the AI literacy obligations under Article 4 of the EU Artificial Intelligence Act, employing a Comparative Curricular Review and Readiness Index methodology to evaluate whether implementation responses are oriented toward developing deep critical AI competence or are predominantly driven by minimal legal compliance logic. The research constructs the AI Literacy Readiness Index (AI-LRI). It applies it to a purposive sample of 36 universities from Germany, France, and Italy, representing three of the EU's largest higher education systems with distinct governance traditions and prior AI education investment trajectories. The AI-LRI integrates five measurement domains: curricular coverage; technical-humanistic balance; institutional governance quality; staff development; and the civic dimension, which addresses democratic participation, fundamental rights, and public accountability. Cross-national benchmarking reveals that German universities demonstrate the highest technical module coverage but the most pronounced HSS-technical imbalance; French universities show the most developed institutional governance frameworks but the lowest civic dimension scores; and Italian universities exhibit the highest curricular integration but the most acute staff development constraints. Critically, 81% of compliance-asserting institutions demonstrate a substantive gap between their formal Article 4 compliance documentation and their actual curricular provision, as assessed by the AI-LRI. This compliance-minimisation dynamic produces modules that satisfy the letter but not the substantive human rights purpose of the obligation. The study contributes the Integrative AI Literacy Curriculum Framework (IALCF), a curriculum architecture organised around three competency clusters: Critical Technical Understanding, Humanistic-Ethical Judgement, and Democratic Civic Engagement as an evidence-based instrument for guiding European universities toward the transformative AI literacy formation that the AI Act's democratic values mandate.


Full Text:

PDF

References


Bray, M., Adamson, B., & Mason, M. (Eds.). (2014). Comparative education research: Approaches and methods (2nd ed.). Springer.

Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung (BMBF). (2023). Nationale KI-Strategie: Fortschrittsbericht 2023. BMBF.

Eshet-Alkalai, Y. (2004). Digital literacy: A conceptual framework for survival skills in the digital era. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 13(1), 93-106.

European Commission. (2024). Guidelines on the implementation of Article 4 of Regulation (EU) 2024/1689 (AI Act): AI literacy obligations. European Commission AI Office.

European Parliament. (2024). Regulation (EU) 2024/1689 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 June 2024 laying down harmonised rules on artificial intelligence (Artificial Intelligence Act). Official Journal of the European Union, L 2024/1689.

Floridi, L., Cowls, J., Beltrametti, M., Chatila, R., Chazerand, P., Dignum, V., Luetge, C., Madelin, R., Pagallo, U., Rossi, F., Schafer, B., Valcke, P., & Vayena, E. (2018). An ethical framework for a good AI society: Opportunities, risks, principles, and recommendations. Minds and Machines, 28(4), 689-707. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11023-018-9482-5

Gilster, P. (1997). Digital literacy. Wiley.

High-Level Expert Group on AI (AI HLEG). (2019). Ethics guidelines for trustworthy AI. European Commission.

Long, D., & Magerko, B. (2020). What is AI literacy? Competencies and design considerations. Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1145/3313831.3376727

Ministère de l'Enseignement Supérieur et de la Recherche. (2023). Plan national pour la science et la technologie de l'intelligence artificielle dans l'enseignement supérieur. MESR.

Ministero dell'Università e della Ricerca (MUR). (2023). Piano Nazionale di Ripresa e Resilienza: Componente 4 Istruzione e ricerca. MUR.

OECD/JRC. (2008). Handbook on constructing composite indicators: Methodology and user guide. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264043466-en

Touretzky, D., Gardner-McCune, C., Martin, F., & Seehorn, D. (2019). Envisioning AI for K-12: What should every child know about AI? Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 33(1), 9795-9799.

Van Dijck, J., Poell, T., & de Waal, M. (2018). The platform society: Public values in a connective world. Oxford University Press.

Vuorikari, R., Kluzer, S., & Punie, Y. (2022). DigComp 2.2: The Digital Competence Framework for Citizens. European Commission Joint Research Centre. https://doi.org/10.2760/115376




DOI: https://doi.org/10.51817/jas.v7i1.444

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.


Flag Counter

Journal of Asian Studies: Culture, Language, Art and Communications indexed in: