An analysis of students' summarizing at University of PGRI Sumatera Barat

Atika Yarsi Utami, Sesmiyanti Sesmiyanti, Elmiati Elmiati

Abstract



Abstract
This research was motivated by several obstacles experienced by students in writing, especially in writing summaries at the English Education Study Program, PGRI University, West Sumatra. This study is a descriptive study with a quantitative approach that aims to analyze how the student summary. The data source of this research is a document in the form of twenty-two student assignments on writing summaries that the researcher obtained from the lecturer in charge of the course. The researcher conducted an analysis using a rubric, and analyzed the indicators achieved from the summary writing assessment, namely length, accuracy, paraphrasing, focus, and grammar, punctuation or spelling error. With the results of the most achieved indicators to the least achieved, the researcher will present the results of the analysis and draw conclusions. The results of this study indicate that the summary of students in the English Education Study Program is 51.13% in length, 95.45% in accuracy, 29.54% in paraphrasing, 68.18 in focus, and 87.5% in convention. From the results obtained, it can be concluded that summarizing is very important, because it can improve the quality of students, especially in writing, developing ideas and making it easier for students to understand the text.
Keyword : writing, summary

Abstrak
Penelitian ini dilatar belakangi oleh beberapa hambatan yang dialami siswa dalam menulis, khususnya dalam menulis ringkasan di Program Studi Pendidikan Bahasa Inggris Universitas PGRI Sumatera Barat. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian deskriptif dengan pendekatan kuantitatif yang bertujuan untuk menganalisa bagaimana rangkuman siswa. Sumber data dari penelitian ini adalah dokumen yang berupa dua puluh dua tugas siswa tentang menulis ringkasan yang didapatkan peneliti dari dosen yang mengampu mata kuliah tersebut. Peneliti melakukan analisis dengan menggunakan rubrik, dan menganalisa indikator yang tercapai dari penilaian menulis ringkasan yaitu panjang, keakuratan, parafrase, fokus, dan grammar, punctuation or spelling error. Dengan hasil indikator yang paling banyak dicapai sampai yang paling sedikit tercapai, peneliti akan memaparkan hasil analisa tersebut dan membuat kesimpulan. Hasil penelitian ini menunjukan bahwa ringkasan siswa di Program Studi Pendidikan Bahasa Inggris ini pada panjang mencapai 51,13%, kekuratan 95,45%, parafrase 29,54%, fokus 68,18, dan konvensi 87,5%. Dari hasil yang didapat dapat disimpulkan bahwa meringkas sangatlah penting, karena dapat meningkatkan kualitas siswa terutama dalam menulis, mengembangkan ide dan mempermudah siswa memahami teks.
Kata kunci : menulis, meringkas


Full Text:

PDF

References


Airasian. Gay. (2012). Educational research competecies for analysis and applications.

Alfaki, I. M. (2015). University Students’ English Writing Problems: Diagnosis and Remedy. International Journal of English Language Teaching, 3(3), 40–52.

Frey, N., Fisher, D., & Hernandez, T. (2003). What’s the gist? Summary writing for struggling adolescent writers. Voices from the Middle, 11(2), 43–49.

Kissner, E. (2006). Summarizing, Paraphrasing, and Retelling Skills for Better Reading , Writing , and Test Taking. Heinemann Educational Books., 145.

Özdemir, S. (2018). The effect of summarization strategies teaching on strategy usage and narrative text summarization success. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 6(10), 2199–2209. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2018.061018

Pečjak, S., & Pirc, T. (2018). Developing Summarizing Skills in 4th Grade Students : Intervention Programme Effects. 10(5), 571–581. https://doi.org/10.26822/iejee.2018541306

Sabu, V., & Vernandes, B. (2019). An Analysis of Student’s Critical Thinking Skills in Writing Argumentative Essay. Vivid: Journal of Language and Literature, 8(2), 59–69. http://jurnalvivid.fib.unand.ac.id/index.php/vivid/article/view/154

Sugiyono. (2013). metode penelitian kuantitatif dan kualitatif dan r&d. English Linguistics Research, 1(1), 118–125. https://doi.org/10.5430/elr.v1n1p118




DOI: https://doi.org/10.51817/jas.v3i1.53

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.


Flag Counter

Journal of Asian Studies: Culture, Language, Art and Communications indexed in: