Navigating the Dual Challenges of Connectivity and Cultural Preservation in Pacific Islands EdTech Strategies (PacREF Framework)

Faleupolu Tuiatua

Abstract


This study examines the educational technology (EdTech) strategies of Pacific Island nations, with particular focus on Fiji, Samoa, and Papua New Guinea, as framed within the Pacific Regional Education Framework (PacREF) 2018-2030 and the UNESCO Global Education Monitoring (GEM) Report 2024. Pacific Island states occupy a structurally distinctive position in the global EdTech landscape, confronting simultaneously the imperatives of digital connectivity and the equally urgent obligation to preserve the linguistic diversity, indigenous epistemologies, and communal pedagogical traditions that constitute the irreplaceable cultural heritage of the Pacific. The research employs a Comparative Policy Analysis and Institutional Case Studies methodology, systematically evaluating national ICT education budget allocations, infrastructure investment strategies, and digital content development expenditures across the three focal countries, situating these within the regional policy architecture of PacREF's Quality and Relevance pillar. The comparative analysis reveals a persistent and structurally embedded tension between infrastructure-first investment logics, which prioritise broadband connectivity, device provisioning, and platform deployment, and culturally responsive content development approaches that centre vernacular language instruction, place-based indigenous knowledge, and community-led pedagogical design. Quantitative analysis of national education budget datasets demonstrates that, in all three focal countries, ICT infrastructure investment substantially outpaces funding for culturally localised content development, creating digital learning environments where connectivity is technically available but pedagogically alienating for learners from indigenous and rural Pacific communities. Drawing on PacREF's conceptual architecture, this study articulates a policy rebalancing framework, the Dual Investment Equilibrium Model (DIEM), that proposes evidence-based criteria for calibrating EdTech investment between infrastructure and culturally responsive content to maximise educational quality, equity, and cultural sustainability across the Pacific Island context.


References


Bray, M., Adamson, B., & Mason, M. (Eds.). (2014). Comparative education research: Approaches and methods (2nd ed.). Springer.

Burnett, G. (2012). Education in the Pacific Islands: The context for development. In I. Helu-Thaman (Ed.), Educational ideas from Oceania (pp. 1-18). University of the South Pacific Press.

Carroll, S. R., Garba, I., Figueroa-Rodríguez, O. L., Holbrook, J., Lovett, R., Materechera, S., Parsons, M., Raseroka, K., Rodriguez-Lonebear, D., Rowe, R., Sara, R., Walker, J. D., Anderson, J., & Hudson, M. (2020). The CARE Principles for Indigenous Data Governance. Data Science Journal, 19(1), 43. http://doi.org/10.5334/dsj-2020-043

Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2018). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.

Education Quality and Assessment Programme (EQAP). (2021). Pacific Islands Literacy and Numeracy Assessment (PILNA) 2021: Regional report. Pacific Community (SPC).

GoPNG Department of Education. (2020). Papua New Guinea National Education Plan 2020-2029. Government of Papua New Guinea.

Hollow, D. (2014). Evaluating ICT in education: A guide for policymakers, planners and practitioners. Commonwealth of Learning.

Ministry of Education, Heritage, and Arts Fiji. (2022). Fiji Digital Education Initiative: Progress report and budget analysis 2020-2022—Government of Fiji.

Pacific Community (SPC). (2018). Pacific Regional Education Framework (PacREF) 2018-2030: Moving forward together for Agenda 2030. Pacific Community.

Samoa Ministry of Education, Sports and Culture. (2021). ICT in Education Implementation Plan 2019-2023: Midterm review. Government of Samoa.

Smith, L. T. (2012). Decolonizing methodologies: Research and Indigenous peoples (2nd ed.). Zed Books.

Taufe'ulungaki, A. M. (2004). The role of research in reforming Pacific education: A challenge. In A. V. Ravuiwasa (Ed.), Re-thinking Pacific education (pp. 43-61). University of the South Pacific.

Thaman, K. H. (2009). Towards cultural democracy in teaching and learning with specific references to Pacific Island Nations (PINs). International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 3(2), 1-9. https://doi.org/10.20429/ijsotl.2009.030211

UNESCO. (2024). Global Education Monitoring Report 2024: Technology in education: A tool on whose terms? UNESCO Publishing.

Vaioleti, T. M. (2006). Talanoa research methodology: A developing position on Pacific research. Waikato Journal of Education, 12(1), 21-34. https://doi.org/10.15663/wje.v12i1.296

Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications: Design and methods (6th ed.). SAGE Publications.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.51817/jas.v6i2.451

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.


Flag Counter

Journal of Asian Studies: Culture, Language, Art and Communications indexed in: