Articles Open Access (CC BY 4.0) Vol. 4 No. 2 (2023) pp. 23-28

SPEAKING STRATEGIES IN TEACHING AND LEARNING INTERACTIONS IN SMAN 2 WEST PASAMAN

Authors

  • Cucu Cahyati 1,✉
  • Silvia Marni 1
  • Silvia Marni 1
  • Indriani Nisja 1
  • Indriani Nisja 1
  1. Universitas PGRI Sumatera Barat

marks the corresponding author.

  • Received: 2024-01-29
  • Published 2023-12-20
DOI: https://doi.org/10.51817/jas.v4i2.326
Download PDF (312 KB)

Abstract

This research is motivated by the importance of speaking strategies in teaching and learning interactions in the classroom and during ongoing learning the teacher is able to express himself by communicating through the speaking strategies used. The aim of this research is to describe or find out the Form and Function of Speaking Strategies in Teaching and Learning Interactions at SMAN 2 Pasaman. This type of research is qualitative research using descriptive methods. The instrument of this research is the researcher himself. The data source was obtained from the teacher's speech during PBM. The data collection techniques in this research are proficient free-involved listening (SBLC), recording, tapping, recording, transcribing and note-taking techniques. The data analysis techniques used are data tabulation, data presentation, interpretation and conclusion drawing. The data validation technique used is the triangulation technique. There are two research results. First, the form of speaking strategy and the function of the teacher's speaking strategy in learning Indonesian in class - positive politeness platitudes, 15 strategies for speaking frankly, negative politeness platitudes, and 1 strategy for speaking vaguely. Second, the dominant speaking strategy used is the strategy of speaking frankly with pleasantries

References

  1. Abdul Malik, D. (2020). Lingua Rima: Jurnal Pendidikan Program Studi Bahasa dan Sastra Indonesia. 9(1), 57–66.
  2. Carolus Borromeus Mulyatno. (2022). Jurnal Pendidikan dan Konseling. Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Konseling, 4, 1349–1358.
  3. Chaer. (2010). Sosiolinguistik perkenalan awal. Jakarta : Rineka Cipta.
  4. Contessa, E. (2018). Pengembangan Buku Teks Pragmatik Program Studi Pendidikan Bahasa, Sastra Indonesia Dan Daerah Fakultas Keguruan Dan Ilmu Pendidikan Universitas Baturaja. Jurnal Bindo Sastra, 2(1), 188. https://doi.org/10.32502/jbs.v2i1.929
  5. Dhea, W. R., Laila, A., & Rahmat, W. (2022). Analysis of Medical Discourse on Online News on Instagram Social Media. Journal of Asian Studies: Culture, Language, Art and Communications, 3(1), 56-64.
  6. Faisol, Y., & Rahmat, W. (2021). Negative Impoliteness and Reconstruction of Identity: Cyberpragmatics Analysis of Palestinian Conflict News Comments on Arab Youtube Channel. Jurnal Arbitrer, 8(2), 168-179.
  7. Febrina, R., Putri, N. A., & Manaf, A. (2015). Kesantunan Berbahasa Dalam Tindak Tutur Direktif Guru Pada Pembelajaran Bahasa Indonesia Di Sma Negeri 15 Padang. Jurnal Bahasa, Sastra Dan Pembelajaran, 2(1), 87–98.
  8. Fitri, Y., Basri, I., & Noveria, E. (2013). Tindak tutur direktif guru bahasa Indonesia dan respon siswa dalam proses belajar mengajar di kelas IX SMP Negri 3 Batusangkar. Pendidikan Bahasa Dan Sastra Indonesia, 1(3), 440–445.
  9. Fitriyani, F., Rahmat, W., & Samsiarni, S. (2022). ANALYSIS OF THE COVID-19 VACCINATION CIRCULAR FOR SCHOOLCHILDREN ON THE INSTAGRAM ACCOUNT@ INFOSUMBAR. Journal of Humanity Studies, 1(1), 29-35.
  10. Handayani, S. R., Sartika, R., & Pebriani, Y. (2023). The Effect of Using the Problem-Based Learning Model on The Ability to Write Explanatory Texts for Grade XI Students of SMA N 3 Lengayang. Journal of Asian Studies: Culture, Language, Art and Communications, 4(1), 8-14.
  11. Gunawan, F. (2017). Representasi Kesantunan Brown dan Levinson dalam Wacana Akademik. Kandai: Jurnal Bahasa Dan Sastra, 10(1), 16–27.
  12. Moleong. (2010). Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif. PT. Remaja Rosdakarya.
  13. Moleong. (2016). Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif. Bandung : PT. Remaja Rosdakarya.
  14. Muliani, S., Hariadi, T., & Safitri, Y. (2022). Daya Pragmatik Tindak Tutur Guru Dalam Interaksi Belajar Mengajar Siswa Kelas Xi Mipa Sma Negeri 1 Galing. 3(1), 66–78.
  15. Nadar. (2009). Pragmatik & Penelitian Pragmatik. Yogyakarta : Graha Ilmu.
  16. Nakrowi, Z. S., & Pujiyanti, A. (2019). Strategi Kesantunan Berbahasa Suku Jawa Dalam Interaksi Antarsuku Di Halmahera Utara. RETORIKA: Jurnal Bahasa, Sastra, Dan Pengajarannya, 12(1), 105. https://doi.org/10.26858/retorika.v12i1.6909
  17. Nugroho, S., Arezah, E., Alwi, M. A., Rahmat, W., Napitupulu, L., & Arief, Y. (2023). Why is Generation Z Prone to Swearing?: A Psycholinguistic Study on Semantic Shifts in Profanity (Mengapa Generasi Z Mudah Mengumpat?: Studi Psikolinguistik pada Perubahan Semantik dalam Umpatan). Jurnal Gramatika: Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan Bahasa dan Sastra Indonesia, 9(2), 301-315.
  18. Nurhamida, N., & Tressyalina, T. (2019). Strategi Bertutur Dalam Tindak Tutur Ekspresif Bahasa Indonesia Pada Kegiatan Diskusi. Pendidikan Bahasa Indonesia, 8(4), 21. https://doi.org/10.24036/106907-019883
  19. Putri, M. N., Sukartha, N., Evi, N. P., & Citrawati, W. (2017). Tindak Ilokusi dan Strategi Bertutur Tokoh dalam Novel Supernova: Akar Karya Dewi Lestari. 20, 66–74.
  20. Rahmat, W. (2018). Linguistik dan Psikolinguistik. Hubungan Psikologi dengan Linguistik dan Objek Kajian Psikolinguistik.
  21. Rahmat, W., Tiawati, R. L., Kemal, E., Tatalia, R. G., Azri, H., & Wulandari, Y. (2023). How Do the Young People Picture Out Their Use, Activeness, and Connectivity on Social Media? A Discourse Analysis Approach. Journal of Communication Inquiry, 01968599231174848.
  22. Rohmadi, M. (2017). Pragmatik Teori dan Analisis. Yuma Pustaka.
  23. Rosnilawati, Ermanto, & Juita, N. (2013). Tindak Tutur dan Strategi Bertutur dalam Pasambahan Maantaan Marapulai Pesta Perkawinan di Alahan Panjang Kabupaten Solok. Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Dan Sastra Indonesia, 1(2), 461–468.
  24. Saputry, D. (2016). Strategi Kesantunan Positif dan Negatif dalam Bentuk Tuturan Direktif di Lingkungan STKIP Muhammadiyah Pringsewu Lampung. Jurnal Pesona, 2(1), 149–160.
  25. Sudaryanto. (2015). Metode dan Aneka Teknik Analisis Bahasa. In yYogyakarta : Duta Wacana University Press. Yogyakarta.
  26. Sugiyono. (2013). Metode Penelitian Kuantitaif, Kualitatif dan R&D. ALFABETA,cv.
  27. Suhartono. (2020). (n.d.). Pragmatik Konteks Indonesia (Vol. 1). Graniti.
  28. Syahrul (Ed.). (2008). Pragmatik Kesantunan Berbahasa Menyibak Fenomena Berbahasa Indoneisa Guru Dan Siswa. UNP Press Padang 2008 Hal 224.
  29. Tarigan. (2009). Pengajaran Pragmatik. Bandung:Angkasa.
  30. Wardoyo, C. (2016). No Title No Title No Title. 1–23.
  31. Wijana. (1995). Dasar-dasar Prakmatik. Andi Yogyakarta.
  32. Yule. (2006). Pragmatik. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar

Downloads

pp. 23-28

Article statistics

Views
4
Downloads
3

Issue information

Issue

Vol. 4 No. 2 (2023)

Section

Articles

CC BY 4.0

Copyright (c) 2023 Copyright (c) 2024 Journal of Asian Studies: Culture, Language, Art and Communications

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.